🔗 Share this article

The recent US security policy document offers a misguided view of Europe. It claims that open-border policies and what it terms "progressive" agendas represent an existential threat to the continent's identity. Yet, this argument rests on a serious misinterpretation of the reality. The true danger facing Europe is not cultural but economic and technological backwardness.

A Glaring Growth Divide Between the US and Europe

The data paint a stark picture. From 2008 and 2023, American economic output surged by 87%, compared to a paltry thirteen and a half percent growth for the European Union. Over this period, European income per person dropped from over three-quarters to just 50% of the American figure. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now has a greater average income than several leading EU nations like France and Italy.

Currently, roughly 50% of the global 50 largest technology firms are American, while a mere four are European.

The Technological Shortfall: A Critical Question

The growing economic gap stems from stronger efficiency gains in the US, fueled by breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The scene of global tech dominance is overwhelmingly US-centric. Over the past five decades, hundreds of American startups have scaled into enterprises valued at more than $10bn, compared with only fourteen in Europe.

This gap raises a vital question: As the competition for tomorrow's sectors like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, what is the EU positioned? Experts widely agree it is largely a contest between two between the United States and China, with European nations starting at a clear handicap.

Underlying Factors of the Continent's Innovation Gap

Several major factors explain this technological divide.

• Financing Ecosystem: The United States has a far deeper and agile network for funding startups. Europe still lacks a true capital markets union, a factor that caps the growth potential of new firms.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Complex and divided rules hamper European business. A American entrepreneur can launch a product under one set of laws to access a consumer base of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a larger population size, is divided among 27 separate systems, creating huge market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on entrepreneurial failure differ sharply. In parts of Europe, business failure was once viewed with penalties, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a valuable lesson.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a deeply integrated innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. Europe's long-term lack of spending in military capabilities has weakened its ability in breakthrough innovation.

The Road Ahead: Grounds for Hopefulness

In spite of these hurdles, one can find causes for optimism. Policymakers are increasingly aware of the severe threat and have begun to propose serious reform. Notable reports on European competitiveness and the single market point to the necessity of major changes.

Given appropriate incentives and regulatory reforms, these assets could support far greater degrees of commercial innovation.

The continent still possesses significant strengths: high-quality workforce, top-tier schools and universities, and world-class research institutions. Coupled with a large internal market and high savings rates, these foundations have the potential to trigger a new wave of investment and entrepreneurship.

Crucially, even if the EU does not become the leader in developing cutting-edge technologies, it can still dramatically boost productivity by implementing and tailoring innovations from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

Europe now stands at a critical crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, economic erosion often happens "gradually and then suddenly". So far, Europe's slide in innovation has been steady. However, without bold steps to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could give way to a rapid and permanent loss of world influence.